During the three weeks we were in China, the computers in our home office were turned off. Our electricity bill for the month was $24 cheaper than the previous one. In fact, our electricity usage has been steadily going down after we switched to compact fluorescent lights (CFL) and became smarter about turning off unused appliances.
I suspect much of the power savings came from the fact that my PowerMac Quad G5 was getting a well-needed rest. I’ve been using this machine, along with an Apple 30-inch Cinema Display, for over two years. The MacBook Pro isn’t as fast as the Quad G5, so it’s not about to replace the PowerMac when I have photos to process or our film to edit. For mundane tasks like email and web browsing, however, it’s perfect and much more portable. In addition, the MBP has distinct advantage over the Quad G5 in the energy usage department.
I used a Kill-A-Watt power meter to measure the power usage of the Quad (with the 30-inch display) and MacBook Pro performing various tasks.
Note that my PowerMac Quad G5 has 6GB of RAM, two 750GB internal SATA drives, an Nvidia 7800GTX video card with 512MB of RAM, and a TeraCard PCI-E SATA card. An iSight camera is also connected to the PowerMac via FireWire. The MacBook Pro has 4GB of RAM and a stock 160GB hard drive.
|Task||Quad G5 / Cinema Display / Total||MacBook Pro / No Battery|
|Boot (Peak)||387 / 80 / 467 Watts||40 / 40 Watts|
|Idle||276 / 80 / 356 Watts||23 / 23 Watts|
|Aperture Straighten / Highlight Tool||425 / 80 / 505 Watts||55 / 35 Watts|
|Aperture Export||425 /80 / 505 Watts||58 / 35 Watts|
The Quad G5 is certainly powerful and power hungry! It certainly doesn’t help that I have even more peripherals attached to the Quad than I was measuring in my tests. In addition to the 30-inch Cinema Display, I have a FireWire iSight camera, a 17-inch Studio Display as a secondary monitor, and a WiebeTech RTX-400 4-bay external SATA box (it’s usually off unless I’m processing photos or editing video). Fortunately, everything is hooked up to a solid APC UPS, so I’m good (for a few minutes) in the event of a power outage.
Even if I plugged the 30-inch display into the MacBook Pro, the laptop would still be more energy efficient than the Quad alone. I read that the new Mac Pros are pretty good compared to the Quad G5, which appears to be the most energy inefficient Macintoshes ever produced.
We’ll never get to the electricity usage levels of Felix in Colorado. Our goal is to get our utilities costs under $100. Having a pool makes it difficult, as it uses tons of water and electricity. With a switch in the way we use our computers, however, I think we can achieve the goal!
4 thoughts on “Electricity Usage Around the House”
Great post Adam – very appropriate for the times we are living in! Our dependence on oil and our ever increasing energy consumption is frightening – we definitely all need to work towards more and more sustainable and renewable energy sources as well as cutting down on energy waste. Over here in Ireland – we have recently installed the worlds first commercial tidal energy generator in Strangford Lough (pictures on the site). Its hoped it will provide energy for up to 1000 homes.
Electricity, Energy, Vibration and Frequency is all part of Profiting in business. Being a serial entrepreneur I’ve realized that having a system increases everything in your business. Using Strategic Mindset, and something called The Covert Matrix – Results by Design.
Can Frequency really build your business?
To higher profits!
I knew my Quad was sucking power, but I never realized how much. Great post. When I hear the fans powering up I know there is a spike of power being used. I’ve been hearing it a lot more as I process my larger image files from the new camera. I wonder how the new high-end Apple workstations would compare in power consumption. I would imagine they’d be less power hungry but by how much?
It’s about a 70 watt difference at idle in favor of the Mac Pro (with 4 hard drives and 8 sticks of RAM) over the Quad.